- Abstract viewed - 3352 times
- PDF downloaded - 1237 times
Affiliations
Stefano Francesco Crinò
Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona
Mirko D’Onofrio
Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona
Laura Bernardoni
Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona
Luca Frulloni
Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona
Michele Iannelli
Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona
Giuseppe Malleo
Department of Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona
Salvatore Paiella
Department of Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona
Alberto Larghi
Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
Armando Gabbrielli
Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona
How to Cite
EUS-guided Radiofrequency Ablation (EUS-RFA) of Solid Pancreatic Neoplasm Using an 18-gauge Needle Electrode: Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success
Abstract
Background & Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is a promising technique for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasm. We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and technical success of pancreatic EUS-RFA performed in a single center.
Methods: 9 consecutive patients (8 with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 1 with renal cancer metastasis) were referred for EUS-RFA between November 2016 and July 2017. EUS-RFA was performed using 18-gauge internally cooled electrode with a 5 or 10 mm exposed tip. Feasibility, technical success or early and late adverse events were assessed.
Results: One patient was excluded because of a large necrotic portion. EUS-RFA was feasible in all the other 8 (100%) cases. An ablated area inside the tumor was achieved in all treated patients. No early or late major adverse event was observed after a mean follow-up of 6 months. Three patients experienced mild postprocedural abdominal pain.
Conclusions: EUS-RFA seems a feasible, safe, and effective procedure for pancreatic neoplasms. Its role in the treatment and management of pancreatic masses must be further investigated.