Population-based Screening in Colorectal Cancer - Current Practice and Future Developments: Faecal Biomarkers Review

Authors

  • David Sawbridge Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK
  • Chris Probert Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK

Keywords:

colorectal cancer screening, faecal/fecal occult blood, endoscopy, colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, CT colonography

Abstract

Background & Aims: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common form of malignancy in Europe and North America, and is one of the major causes of cancer death, with a 50.7% 5 year mortality rate. The majority of cases are of a sporadic nature and develop from a pre-cancerous lesion. Screening programmes have been introduced in many countries to detect and treat the condition. These mostly rely on a combination of faecal occult blood tests and endoscopy to guide diagnosis. They are expensive to establish and run, have a potential for false negatives (especially for high risk adenomas and right sided cancers) and they are often unacceptable to a significant percentage of the at-risk population. Consequently many groups have sought sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarkers for CRC and adenomas. These biomarkers form three broad categories: cytogenetic, enzymatic/protein and metabolomic.

Methods:
 Pubmed and Medline databases were searched to identify relevant articles concerning colorectal cancer screening.

Conclusion: 
Here we provide a review of the current population-based screening possibilities and faecal biomarkers currently under investigation, an assessment of their cost-effectiveness, their eficacy and suggestions for the future of large scale screening in CRC.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-01

How to Cite

1.
Sawbridge D, Probert C. Population-based Screening in Colorectal Cancer - Current Practice and Future Developments: Faecal Biomarkers Review. JGLD [Internet]. 2014 Jun. 1 [cited 2026 Jul. 19];23(2):195-202. Available from: https://www.jgld.ro/jgld/index.php/jgld/article/view/1309

Issue

Section

Review