- Abstract viewed - 4685 times
- PDF downloaded - 1644 times
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Affiliations
Ioan Sporea
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania
Daniela Larisa Săndulescu
Centre for Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova, Romania
Roxana Şirli
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania
Alina Popescu
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania
Mirela Danilă
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania
Zeno Spârchez
Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Cătălina Mihai
Department of Gastroenterology, Gr. T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iași, Romania
Simona Ioanițescu
Department of Internal Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute, and Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Tudor Moga
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania
Bogdan Timar
Department of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania
Ciprian Brisc
Department of Gastroenterology, University of Oradea, Romania
Dana Nedelcu
Ponderas and Neolife Hospitals, Bucharest, Romania
Adrian Săftoiu
Centre for Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova, Romania
Viorela Enăchescu
Clinical Hospital “Filantropia”, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania
Radu Badea
Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
How to Cite
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Characterization of Malignant versus Benign Focal Liver Lesions in a Prospective Multicenter Experience – The SRUMB Study
Abstract
Aim: This study evaluated the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the differential diagnosis of benign vs. malignant focal liver lesions (FLL) in a real-life, multicenter experience.
Methods: This prospective study, including 14 Romanian centers, was performed over a 6 year period (February 2011- April 2017) and included 2062 FLLs assessed by CEUS. Inclusion criteria were: newly diagnosed FLL on B-mode ultrasound, less than three lesions/patient, all FLLs evaluated by CEUS and by a second-line imaging technique (contrast enhanced CT or contrast enhanced MRI) or histology, considered as reference. The trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier NCT01329458).
Results: From the 2062 FLLs included in the study, 57.2% (1179) were malignant and 42.8% (883) were benign. CEUS had 83.9% sensitivity (Se), 97.8% specificity (Sp), 98.1% positive predictive value (PPV), 82.2% negative predictive value (NPV) and a diagnostic accuracy (Ac) of 89.9% for the positive diagnosis of malignant lesions. For the benign lesions, CEUS had 97.8% Se, 83.9% Sp, 82.2% PPV, 98.1% NPV 89.9% Ac. The diagnostic performance of CEUS for hepatocellular carcinoma was 76.6% Se, 98.4% Sp, and 91.2% Ac; for hemangioma: 89.2% Se, 99% Sp, and 96.9% Ac and for metastases: 90.9% Se, 98.4% Sp, and 96.9% Ac.
Conclusions: CEUS proved a high accuracy in differentiating the malignant vs. benign character of a FLL. It can be confidently used as a first line imaging method in daily practice.